Sports that add years

Tennis players outlived sedentary people by nearly a decade in the Copenhagen study, and the social sports beat the solo ones across the board.

Updated 2026-08-17

Test yourself: Exercise quiz9 questions · ~1 minStart →

Sports and longevity, by the numbers

⚽
+9.7 yrs

of life associated with tennis versus a sedentary life in the 25-year Copenhagen City Heart Study. The social sports top the table.

Extra years, by sport

Versus sedentary, Copenhagen City Heart Study (8,600 adults)

Tennis+9.7 yrs
Badminton+6.2 yrs
Soccer+4.7 yrs
Cycling+3.7 yrs
Swimming+3.4 yrs
Jogging+3.2 yrs
Calisthenics+3.1 yrs
Gym workouts+1.5 yrs

Schnohr et al. [1]. Observational: who picks each sport explains part of the gap.

The short version

  • •In the 25-year Copenhagen City Heart Study of 8,600 adults, tennis was associated with 9.7 extra years of life versus being sedentary, badminton 6.2, soccer 4.7, cycling 3.7, swimming 3.4, jogging 3.2, and solo gym work 1.5 [1].
  • •A separate 80,000-person analysis agrees on the order: racket sports carried 47% lower all-cause mortality, swimming 28%, aerobics 27% [2].
  • •The pattern is social: the sports that require another human beat the sports you do alone, consistent with the connection research, though observational studies cannot fully prove why.
  • •Running still counts: even 5 to 10 minutes a day of slow running was associated with about 3 years of extra life in a 55,000-person cohort [3].
  • •Cycling to work was associated with 41% lower all-cause mortality in 264,000 UK commuters [4]. The commute is a sport if you let it be.
Test yourself: Exercise quiz9 questions · ~1 minStart →

If exercise is the drug, sport is the delivery mechanism, and it turns out the choice of vehicle matters. Two large studies have ranked sports by the years of life associated with them, and the pattern in both is striking: the more social the sport, the bigger the number. These are observational findings, so healthier and wealthier people may pick certain sports rather than the sport doing all the work, but the consistency across studies is hard to dismiss, and the practical advice it points to costs nothing to follow.

1

Racket sports

Top of both tables. Tennis was associated with 9.7 extra years and badminton 6.2 in the Copenhagen City Heart Study [1], and racket sports carried 47% lower all-cause mortality in an 80,000-person UK analysis [2]. Interval-style bursts plus a partner who expects you to show up.

Do this

If you have ever played tennis, badminton, squash, padel, or pickleball, book one court hour a week with a regular partner. The appointment is half the medicine.

Take the exercise quiz →
2

The social ingredient

The Copenhagen authors noticed their ranking sorts almost perfectly by social interaction, not calories: sports built around another person beat solo training even at similar effort. That matches the connection literature, where strong social ties are associated with 50% higher survival odds [5].

Do this

Whatever you play, add people to it. A running club, a doubles partner, a lifting buddy: you compound the exercise years with the connection years.

Take the social life quiz →
3

Team ball sports

Soccer was associated with 4.7 extra years in Copenhagen, and randomized trials of recreational football in untrained adults show VO2max gains of 7 to 15% plus meaningful blood pressure drops in 12 to 16 weeks (Krustrup, British Journal of Sports Medicine reviews). Small-sided games are intervals in disguise.

Do this

Find a weekly small-sided game: 5-a-side soccer, basketball, or anything with a ball and a group chat. Casual level is exactly where the evidence was collected.

Take the exercise quiz →
4

Swimming

Swimming carried 28% lower all-cause mortality in the UK analysis and 3.4 extra years in Copenhagen. It is the rare intense sport with near-zero joint load, which makes it the one you can still be doing at 85, and consistency over decades is where sport pays.

Do this

If your knees, hips, or weight make land sports painful, swim twice a week. Lessons count as training; technique is the barrier, not fitness.

Take the exercise quiz →
5

Cycling, especially built into the day

Cycling was associated with 3.7 extra years in Copenhagen, and in 264,000 UK commuters, cycling to work carried 41% lower all-cause mortality and about half the cancer and cardiovascular incidence of passive commuting [4]. Exercise you do not have to schedule is exercise that actually happens.

Do this

If any regular trip is under 30 minutes by bike, make it a cycling trip. The commute version needs no willpower after the first two weeks.

Take the exercise quiz →
6

Running, in surprisingly small doses

Jogging was associated with 3.2 extra years in Copenhagen, and in 55,000 adults followed 15 years, runners lived about 3 years longer than non-runners, with benefits appearing at just 5 to 10 minutes a day at slow speeds [3].

Do this

Do not wait until you can run 5k. A 10 minute slow jog, most days, already sits on the good part of the curve. Add a parkrun for the social multiplier.

Take the exercise quiz →
7

Solo gym work, the honest floor

Calisthenics was associated with 3.1 extra years in Copenhagen and gym training 1.5, the bottom of the table but still clearly better than nothing. The gap to the social sports may partly reflect who chooses each, but strength work remains essential for the muscle and bone that sports need [6].

Do this

Keep the gym for what it does best, strength, and get your cardio somewhere with a scoreboard or a friend. Or convert the gym itself: classes and training partners move it up this list.

Take the exercise quiz →
8

The best sport is the one with a schedule

Every effect in this article was measured in people who kept showing up for years. Adherence research is unambiguous: activities with fixed times, other people, and identity attached (a team, a club, a league) survive winters and busy months; solo good intentions mostly do not.

Do this

Choose by fun and fixture, not calories: the sport you will still be playing in 5 years beats the optimal one you quit by March. Book the recurring slot today.

Take the exercise quiz →

How to tell if yours is good

Signals you can read yourself, starting today, and what a good reading looks like.

A fixture

At least one recurring sport slot in the calendar that other people expect you at

Variety

Something for the heart, something for strength, most weeks

Company

At least one session a week involves other humans

Durability

A sport you could still play in 20 years, already in rotation

Fun

You would do your sport even if it did nothing for your span

Check your own risk

5 quick questions about you, not the article. You get a personal readout of where your risks sit.

Pick an answer to reveal the numbers: check points for every answer (+2p working for you, +1p worth tightening, +0p elevated risk), plus life-model years where an answer maps to one (+0y = measured, no effect on its own).

1. Do you have a recurring sport or training slot that other people expect you at?

2. Does at least one workout or sport session a week involve other people?

3. Where does your cardio actually come from — what sport or activity do you do most?

4. Is there a sport in your rotation you could still play in 20 years?

5. Do you skip short workouts because they do not feel worth doing?

Now score your own

These two-minute quizzes turn this research into your numbers, and the years they are worth.

Go deeper in the Wiki

Sources

  1. [1]P. Schnohr et al. Various Leisure-Time Physical Activities Associated With Widely Divergent Life Expectancies: The Copenhagen City Heart Study. Mayo Clin Proc, 93(12):1775-1785, 2018. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.06.025 Evidence: Low
  2. [2]P. Oja et al. Associations of specific types of sports and exercise with all-cause and cardiovascular-disease mortality: a cohort study of 80 306 British adults. Br J Sports Med, 51(10):812-817, 2017. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096822 Evidence: Low
  3. [3]D. C. Lee et al. Leisure-time running reduces all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk. J Am Coll Cardiol, 64(5):472-81, 2014. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.058 Evidence: Low
  4. [4]C. A. Celis-Morales et al. Association between active commuting and incident cardiovascular disease, cancer, and mortality: prospective cohort study. BMJ, 357:j1456, 2017. doi:10.1136/bmj.j1456 Evidence: Low
  5. [5]J. Holt-Lunstad, T. B. Smith, and J. B. Layton. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med, 7(7):e1000316, 2010. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 Evidence: High
  6. [6]H. Momma et al. Muscle-strengthening activities are associated with lower risk and mortality in major non-communicable diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Br J Sports Med, 56(13):755-763, 2022. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2021-105061 Evidence: High
  7. [7]P. Krustrup and B. R. Krustrup. Football is medicine: it is time for patients to play!. Br J Sports Med, 52(22):1412-1414, 2018. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2018-099377 Evidence: Not graded (review)

See where you sit

Email

Longevity posts, plain English

Occasional notes when we publish: what the studies say, without hype. Unsubscribe anytime.

YapSpan estimates are for reflection and entertainment only. They are not medical advice, a diagnosis, or a prediction of any individual outcome. Check with a doctor before making any medical decision.