Esophageal cancer
Factors that swing esophageal cancer deaths
Factors that swing esophageal cancer deaths
Scroll sideways to see every factor →
Tap a pill to answer yours.
Where you sit
0 of 10 answered
Answer the 10 factors above to see which ones raise your own risk, which sit at the reference, and which the studies have no number for.
Relative risk versus each factor’s reference group; above the line is lower risk, below it higher.
Sources (10)Teshima et al., Eur J Public Health 2026 · Islami et al., Int J Cancer 2011 · Turati et al., Ann Oncol 2013 and 7 moreShow allHide
- [1]T. Chen et al. Family history of esophageal cancer increases the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep, 5:16038, 2015. doi:10.1038/srep16038 Evidence: Low
- [2]F. Islami et al. Alcohol drinking and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with focus on light-drinkers and never-smokers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer, 129(10):2473-84, 2011. doi:10.1002/ijc.25885 Evidence: Moderate
- [3]F. Turati et al. A meta-analysis of body mass index and esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol, 24(3):609-17, 2013. doi:10.1093/annonc/mds244 Evidence: High
- [4]A. Teshima et al. Evaluating the effect of cigarettes smoking on oesophageal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis with dose-response relationships. Eur J Public Health, 36(4), 2026. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckag123 Evidence: High
- [5]S. Vingeliene et al. An update of the WCRF/AICR systematic literature review and meta-analysis on dietary and anthropometric factors and esophageal cancer risk. Ann Oncol, 28(10):2409-2419, 2017. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx338 Evidence: Moderate
- [6]Y. Wang et al. Association between tooth loss and risk of oesophageal cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis. Springerplus, 5(1):1020, 2016. doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2711-6 Evidence: Low
- [7]J. Liu et al. Intake of fruit and vegetables and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Cancer, 133(2):473-85, 2013. doi:10.1002/ijc.28024 Evidence: Moderate
- [8]S. C. Moore et al. Association of Leisure-Time Physical Activity With Risk of 26 Types of Cancer in 1.44 Million Adults. JAMA Intern Med, 176(6):816-25, 2016. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1548 Evidence: High
- [9]W. Huang et al. Risk of esophageal cancer in diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Cancer Causes Control, 23(2):263-72, 2012. doi:10.1007/s10552-011-9874-9 Evidence: Moderate
- [10]X. Du, K. Hidayat, and B. M. Shi. Abdominal obesity and gastroesophageal cancer risk: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Biosci Rep, 37(3), 2017. doi:10.1042/BSR20160474 Evidence: Moderate
Every factor, one by one
One quick question each. The charts above follow your answers, and so does every other What Matters page that asks the same question.
#1Family history[1]8×
In a population-based case-control study, one first-degree relative with esophageal cancer went with 85% more esophageal squamous-cell cancer, and the excess rose with the number of relatives affected: both parents affected carried an 8-fold excess.
Any strong family history of cancer?
Not answered yet. Tap an option to save your answer. Saved to your quiz answers, so the quiz shows it too.
#2Alcohol[2]+454%
Across 40 case-control and 13 cohort studies, moderate drinking (roughly one to four drinks a day) went with 2.62 times more esophageal squamous-cell cancer, and heavy drinking (four or more) with 5.54 times more; alcohol works mainly through this squamous-cell route.
How much alcohol do you drink?
Not answered yet. Tap an option to save your answer. Saved to your quiz answers, so the quiz shows it too.
#3Body weight[3]+173%
Weight works through the other route: reflux and Barrett’s esophagus feeding the adenocarcinoma type.
How would you describe your weight?
Same number, 2 answers: The meta-analysis pooled everyone with a BMI of 30 or over as one obese group.
Not answered yet. Tap an option to save your answer. Saved to your quiz answers, so the quiz shows it too.
#4Smoking[4]+168%
Across 178 studies published up to 2026, current smokers got esophageal cancer at 2.68 times the rate of never smokers, and former smokers at 1.71 times; the excess was steeper for the squamous-cell type (3.03×) than the adenocarcinoma type (2.25×).
Do you smoke?
Not answered yet. Tap an option to save your answer. Saved to your quiz answers, so the quiz shows it too.
#5Processed meat[5]+59%
In the WCRF/AICR’s pooled cohort analysis, every 50 g a day of processed meat (bacon, deli meat, sausage) went with 59% more esophageal squamous-cell cancer.
How often do you eat processed meat (bacon, deli, sausage)?
Not answered yet. Tap an option to save your answer. Saved to your quiz answers, so the quiz shows it too.
#6Oral hygiene[6]+53%
Across nine studies and over 113,000 people, heavy tooth loss went with 53% more esophageal cancer than the least tooth loss; a separate study in a high-risk region found skipping daily brushing carried a similar excess on its own, seemingly independent of smoking.
How often do you see a dentist?
Not answered yet. Tap an option to save your answer. Saved to your quiz answers, so the quiz shows it too.
#7Fruit & vegetables[7]−45%
Across 32 studies and over 10,000 cases, the highest fruit and vegetable eaters got esophageal squamous-cell cancer about half as often as the lowest: relative risk 0.53 for fruit and 0.56 for vegetables, highest versus lowest intake.
How many servings of vegetables and fruit do you eat a day?
Not answered yet. Tap an option to save your answer. Saved to your quiz answers, so the quiz shows it too.
#8Physical inactivity[8]−42%
In 1.44 million adults across 12 cohorts, the most active tenth developed 42% less esophageal adenocarcinoma than the least active tenth, likely running through weight and reflux.
How many days a week do you get 30+ minutes of exercise?
Not answered yet. Tap an option to save your answer. Saved to your quiz answers, so the quiz shows it too.
#9Diabetes[9]+30%
Across 17 studies, diabetes went with 30% more esophageal cancer, the excess showing up in men (28% more) but not clearly in women.
What’s your blood sugar like?
Same number, 2 answers: The meta-analysis compared diabetes with no diabetes; it did not split by how well it was controlled.
Not answered yet. Tap an option to save your answer. Saved to your quiz answers, so the quiz shows it too.
#10Waist size[10]
Across seven prospective cohorts and 913,182 people, the largest waists went with 2.06 times more esophageal cancer than the smallest.
How’s your waistline?
Not answered yet. Tap an option to save your answer. Saved to your quiz answers, so the quiz shows it too.
Cancer, site by site
Share of cancer deaths by site, SEER/NCHS (National Cancer Institute SEER Program, National Cancer Institute Evidence: Not graded (statistics)). Most sites have their own pills chart now — tap one — the smallest are still listed with their share alone.
- Lung 30.9% ›
- Blood 10.1% ›
- Colorectal 9.6% ›
- Pancreatic 9% ›
- Breast 6.4% ›
- Prostate 5.9% ›
- Liver 5.3% ›
- Bladder 4.8% ›
- Ovarian 4.8% ›
- Esophageal 3.2% · here
- Stomach 2.7% ›
- Other 2.7%
- Melanoma 1.6% ›
- Kidney 1.6%
- Uterine 1.6% ›
Read more
Colon health deep dive ›Smoking deep dive ›Gut & screening quiz ›